The review process
Abstract submissions to TERNZ conferences are peer reviewed in line with the TERNZ philosophy of being collaborative and developmental. All abstracts will be available in the conference proceedings.
Reviews will be conducted normally by two peer reviewers, at least one of whom will be an experienced TERNZ participant. As much as is practicable reviews will include peers with research or professional experience as appropriate to the session track selected.
Author(s) will have the opportunity to revise their abstracts in response to the feedback received. Acceptance of the abstract in the intended format may be conditional upon these revisions.
Call for reviewers
We invite all members of the HERDSA NZ/TERNZ community, from novice to experienced, to contribute to the TERNZ review process. To ensure commitment to the community and an awareness of the TERNZ context, reviewers must be intending to attend the upcoming TERNZ conference or must have attended previous TERNZ conferences. We strongly encourage those who plan to attend the upcoming TERNZ conference, and especially submitting authors, to participate in the review process.
Details on the review framework and how to express interest will be posted here when there is a TERNZ conference being held.
