The review process
Abstract submissions to TERNZ 2024 are peer reviewed in line with the TERNZ philosophy of being collaborative and developmental. All abstracts will be available in the conference proceedings
Reviews will be conducted normally by two peer reviewers, at least one of whom will be an experienced TERNZ participant. As much as is practicable reviews will include peers with research or professional experience as appropriate to the session track selected.
Author(s) will have the opportunity to revise their abstracts in response to the feedback received. Acceptance of the abstract in the intended format may be conditional upon these revisions.
Call for reviewers
We invite all members of the HERDSA NZ/TERNZ community, from novice to experienced, to express their interest in reviewing for TERNZ 2024. To ensure commitment to the community and an awareness of the TERNZ context, reviewers must be intending to attend TERNZ 2024 or must have attended previous TERNZ conferences. We strongly encourage those who plan to attend TERNZ 2024, and especially submitting authors, to participate in the review process.
Reviews will be conducted using the TERNZ 2024 Review Framework with a focus on positive and developmental support for participants.
Key dates
• Reviewer expression of interest: Ideally by 30th August
• Abstract submission deadline: 6th September
• Review decisions: 11th October
• Abstract revision deadline: 31st October
Late submissions will be accepted at the discretion of the review committee. To enable a smooth review process and timely scheduling of sessions, submitters are urged to submit by the stated deadline.
Reviewer Expression of Interest Form
